AR for All – Is this Democratization of Spatial Design?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33959/cuijca.v3i1.8Abstract
Augmented reality is hailed in published discourse for its potential to democratise spatial authorship. It offers the possibility for people to participate in spatial design activity without requiring any specialised skills. Everyone has ideas about the built environment, but conveying 3D information has conventionally relied either on scaled down models or 2D representations, in turn requiring extensive education and training to master. This convention has precluded anyone from participating in decision-making who did not have access to such skills. Augmented reality, or AR, offers communication of 3D ideas directly through 3D visualisations on handheld devices, thus re-kindling the dream of all citizens to have equal access to spatial decision-making. For this vision to turn into reality however, the technology will have to become more prolific than sketching. This paper seeks to encourage more and more people into playing with AR and identifying ways to ease the use of the technology. It aims to promote experimentation with AR by sharing a basic level protocol for setting up a customised operation, along with brief descriptions of two key caveats: accuracy and reliability. Overall it seems that AR is as yet predominantly geared towards gaming, and therefore requires some tweaking for use as a spatial design tool. Experimenting with it though has certainly become accessible for all.Â
References
References
Khan, M.A. and A. Dong, Using Geo-Located Augmented Reality for Community Evaluation, in CAAD Futures 2011 : Designing Together, P. Leclercq, A. Heylighen, and G. Martin, Editors. 2011, CAADFutures: University of Leige, Belgium. p. 701-720.
Wang, X., Augmented reality in architecture and design: potentials and challenges for application. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 2009. 7(2): p. 309-326.
Dünser, A., R. Grasset, and M. Billinghurst, A survey of evaluation techniques used in augmented reality studies. 2008: Human Interface Technology Laboratory New Zealand.
Billinghurst, M., A. Clark, and G. Lee, A survey of augmented reality. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction, 2015. 8(2-3): p. 73-272.
Hartmann, J. and D. Vogel. An Evaluation of Mobile Phone Pointing in Spatial Augmented Reality. in Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2018. ACM.
Park, M.K., et al., Spatial augmented reality for product appearance design evaluation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 2015. 2(1): p. 38-46.
Santos, M.E.C., et al., Augmented reality learning experiences: Survey of prototype design and evaluation. IEEE Transactions on learning technologies, 2014. 7(1): p. 38-56.
Hoskyns, T., Designing the Agon: Questions on Architecture, Space, Democracy and “the Political, in Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, B. Latour and P. Weibel, Editors. 2005.
Kolarevic, B., From Mass Customisation to Design ‘Democratisation’. Architectural Design, 2015. 85(6): p. 48-53.
Verebes, T., Mass-Customised Cities. 2015: Wiley.
Lupton, E., D.I.Y.: Design It Yourself: A Design Handbook. 2006: Princeton.
Alexander, C., S. Ishikawa, and M. Silverstein, A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. 1977: Oxford University Press.
Walker, B., Another Kind of Science: Christopher Alexander on Democratic Theory and the Built Environment. Canadian Journal of Political Science 2003. 36(5): p. 1053-1072.
Foth, M., H.G. Klaebe, and G.N. Hearn, The role of new media and digital narratives in urban planning and community development. Body, Space & Technology, 2008. 7(2).
Akçayır, M. and G. Akçayır, Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 2017. 20: p. 1-11.
Chen, P., et al., A review of using Augmented Reality in Education from 2011 to 2016, in Innovations in Smart Learning. 2017, Springer. p. 13-18.
Brusaporci, S., Advanced Mixed Heritage: A Visual Turn Through Digitality and Reality of Architecture. International Journal of Computational Methods in Heritage Science (IJCMHS), 2018. 2(1): p. 40-60.
Abdullah, F., M.H.B. Kassim, and A.N.Z. Sanusi, Go virtual: exploring augmented reality application in representation of steel architectural construction for the enhancement of architecture education. Advanced Science Letters, 2017. 23(2): p. 804-808.
Ens, B., et al. Ivy: Exploring spatially situated visual programming for authoring and understanding intelligent environments. in Proceedings of the 43rd Graphics Interface Conference. 2017. Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society.
Barton, J., J. Plume, and B. Parolin, Public participation in a spatial decision support system for public housing. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2005. 29(6): p. 630-652.
Gordon, E. and E. Manosevitch, Augmented deliberation: Merging physical and virtual interaction to engage communities in urban planning. New Media & Society, 2011. 13(1): p. 75-95.
Korn, M., Place and Situated Deliberation in Partic-ipatory Planning–A Research Proposal. Guest Editors, 2011: p. 41.
Ratti, C. and M. Claudel, A/B Architecture: Publicly Augmented Design. Architectural Design, 2016. 86(5): p. 42-47.
McCall, M.K. and C.E. Dunn, Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: Fulfilling the criteria for ‘good’governance? Geoforum, 2012. 43(1): p. 81-94.
Ertiö, T.-P., Participatory Apps for Urban Planning--Space for Improvement. Planning Practice & Research, 2015. 30(3): p. 303-321.
Ertiö, T.-P., et al. Supporting ‘participation’in mobile participation. in Proceedings of the ePart 2014 Conference, Dublin, Ireland. 2014.
Pascoal, R., et al. A survey of augmented reality: Making technology acceptable in outdoor environments. in 2018 13th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). 2018. IEEE.
Viegas, C. DAPP. 2009 [cited 2017; Available from: https://download.cnet.com/Dapp-Lite-The-App-Creator-for-iPhone-and-iPad/3000-2124_4-77651160.html.
Mota, J.M., et al., Augmented reality mobile app development for all R. 2017.
Amin, D. and S. Govilkar, Comparative study of augmented reality SDKs. International Journal on Computational Science & Applications, 2015. 5(1): p. 11-26.
Clini, P., et al., Real/not real: pseudo-holography and augmented reality applications for cultural heritage, in Handbook of Research on Emerging Technologies for Digital Preservation and Information Modeling. 2017, IGI Global. p. 201-227.
Cuendet, S., et al., Designing Augmented Reality for the Classroom. 2012, Elsevier.
Wüest, R. and S. Nebiker, Geospatial Augmented Reality for the interactive exploitation of large-scale walkable orthoimage maps in museums. Proceedings of the ICA, Volume 1, 2018, pp. 124, 2018. 1: p. 124.
Pryss, R., et al., The AREA Framework for Location-Based Smart Mobile Augmented Reality Applications. International Journal of Ubiquitous Systems and Pervasive Networks (JUSPN), 2017. 9(1): p. 13-21.
Mota, J.M., et al., Augmented reality mobile app development for all. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 2018. 65: p. 250-260.
Vuforia. Vuforia. 2016 [cited 2016; Available from: https://http://www.vuforia.com/.
HITLab. CityViewAR. 2011 [cited 2016; Available from: http://www.hitlabnz.org/index.php/products/cityviewar/.
ARToolKit. ARToolKit. 2016 [cited 2016; Available from: https://artoolkit.org/.
Ganapathy, S., Design guidelines for mobile augmented reality: User experience, in Human Factors in Augmented Reality Environments. 2013, Springer. p. 165-180.
Reinwald, F., et al., Augmented Reality at the Service of Participatory Urban Planning and Community Informatics–a case study from Vienna. The Journal of Community Informatics, 2014. 10(3).
Wikitude. Wikitude World Browser. 2016 [cited 2016 24th February]; Available from: http://www.wikitude.com/tour/wikitude-world-browser.
Layar. Layar Reality Browser. 2016 [cited 2016 10th January]; Available from: http://www.layar.com/browser/.
Cooley, B., GPS Update. 2015.
Maisto, M., et al., Evaluation of wearable haptic systems for the fingers in augmented reality applications. IEEE transactions on haptics, 2017. 10(4): p. 511-522.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Mohammad Ashraf Khan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
Non Commercial - You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.